Amruta Fadnavis Threat Case: HC Dismisses Anil Jaisinghani’s Plea Against ‘Illegal’ Arrest

The Bombay Excessive Court docket on Monday dismissed a petition filed by suspected bookie Anil Jaisinghani difficult his “unlawful” arrest in a case of alleged try to blackmail and bribe Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’s spouse Amruta Fadnavis.

A division bench headed by Justice A S Gadkari stated the plea was dismissed because it was with none deserves.

The Malabar Hill police station in south Mumbai had on February 20 registered a First Data Report (FIR) in opposition to Anil Jaisinghani and his daughter Aniksha Jaisinghani for allegedly threatening to make public sure audio and video clips that purportedly present Amruta Fadnavis accepting favours from Aniksha.

They had been booked for offences underneath Part 120B (legal conspiracy) and Part 385 (extortion) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 (induce public servant utilizing corrupt means) and 12 (abetment) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Aniksha, who was arrested on March 17, was granted bail within the case on March 27 by a periods court docket.

Her father Anil Jaisinghani was later arrested by the Mumbai Police from Gujarat and he’s at the moment in judicial custody.

In his petition within the HC, Anil Jaisinghani claimed he was illegally arrested within the case on March 19 however was not produced earlier than the court docket inside 24 hours as mandated in regulation.

His advocate Mrigendra Singh had argued that Jaisinghani was produced earlier than the court docket in Mumbai 36 hours after his arrest.

ALSO READ: Amruta Fadnavis Threat Case: Mumbai Court Denies Bail To ‘Bookie’ Anil Jaisinghani

Singh alleged that every part within the case was being monitored by the complainant’s husband who’s the deputy chief minister of Maharashtra.

State Advocate Common Birendra Saraf had refuted the allegations and stated the police adopted all procedures correctly and there had been no delay in producing Jaisinghani earlier than the court docket for remand.

Saraf stated the police had merely taken “possession” of Jaisinghani on March 19 and so they needed to provide him earlier than the competent court docket in Mumbai.

He stated as per the arrest memo, Jaisinghani was arrested on March 20 at 5 pm and was produced earlier than the periods court docket on March 21.

(This report has been printed as a part of the auto-generated syndicate wire feed. Aside from the headline, no enhancing has been completed within the copy by ABP Reside.)

Image / Information Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *